<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for New Start Nova Scotia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newstartns.ca/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newstartns.ca</link>
	<description>New Start Nova Scotia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:03:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Powerful Opportunities by gordon stanfield</title>
		<link>http://newstartns.ca/2012/01/powerful-opportunities/comment-page-1/#comment-3114</link>
		<dc:creator>gordon stanfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newstartns.ca/?p=952#comment-3114</guid>
		<description>Yes Bill, your&#039;s is good advice; but we have a whole generation or two who have the &#039;leisure&#039; of N.I.M.B.Yism. There is risk in progress. 

Seems to me that there are activists all over the world today. Our&#039;s are comfortably against prosperity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Bill, your&#8217;s is good advice; but we have a whole generation or two who have the &#8216;leisure&#8217; of N.I.M.B.Yism. There is risk in progress. </p>
<p>Seems to me that there are activists all over the world today. Our&#8217;s are comfortably against prosperity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Commuter Cut &#8211; Follow Up by David Parkes</title>
		<link>http://newstartns.ca/2011/05/commuter-cut-follow-up/comment-page-2/#comment-3093</link>
		<dc:creator>David Parkes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 22:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newstartns.ca/?p=557#comment-3093</guid>
		<description>Bill,
Please revisit the study that showed it would cost only $46 Million (not $200 Million) to pave one lane of the railcut and make a reversible transit way which could be used by trucks exiting the South end outside of rush hours.  One way in, in the morning and one way out after 9.30 AM; closed at 8.00 PM.  Then maybe commuters would leave their cars at home and take the (express) bus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill,<br />
Please revisit the study that showed it would cost only $46 Million (not $200 Million) to pave one lane of the railcut and make a reversible transit way which could be used by trucks exiting the South end outside of rush hours.  One way in, in the morning and one way out after 9.30 AM; closed at 8.00 PM.  Then maybe commuters would leave their cars at home and take the (express) bus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Budget Season by Bill</title>
		<link>http://newstartns.ca/2012/01/budget-season/comment-page-1/#comment-3083</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newstartns.ca/?p=900#comment-3083</guid>
		<description>Attrition is an ineffective way to reduce employees in any organization because:
1)you can&#039;t control the quality of those leaving
2)you can&#039;t control the age of those leaving
thus you may be left with the oldest, least qualified and unmotivated and unnecessary.
Abolish seniority and dismiss the least effective 5% every year.
I don&#039;t know if I would be demoralized or ecstatic to serve under a Minister like Paris
.If I were competent I would be demoralized and would not want it on my resume.
If I were incompetent I would be ecstatic and would never need a resume.
So much for attrition</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Attrition is an ineffective way to reduce employees in any organization because:<br />
1)you can&#8217;t control the quality of those leaving<br />
2)you can&#8217;t control the age of those leaving<br />
thus you may be left with the oldest, least qualified and unmotivated and unnecessary.<br />
Abolish seniority and dismiss the least effective 5% every year.<br />
I don&#8217;t know if I would be demoralized or ecstatic to serve under a Minister like Paris<br />
.If I were competent I would be demoralized and would not want it on my resume.<br />
If I were incompetent I would be ecstatic and would never need a resume.<br />
So much for attrition</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Powerful Opportunities by Harold</title>
		<link>http://newstartns.ca/2012/01/powerful-opportunities/comment-page-1/#comment-3077</link>
		<dc:creator>Harold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newstartns.ca/?p=952#comment-3077</guid>
		<description>Bill, your comments are very appropriate and timely, on this subject!

I have been dealing with groundwater contamination and well water supply issues for about 30 years.  Julian&#039;s comments, in my opinion, represent one end of the spectrum in the arguments for and against horizontal fracking (HF).  

In my experience, the issue always revolves around money and risk.  In each geologic basin and hydrogeologic (i.e., water supply) area, will be unique.  Companies have been obviously historically focused on spending money to find and map the gas resource.  With HF, money also needs to be spent on integrating the geology, with the geomechanics and hydrogeology of that area; this will enable assessment of the risk to overlying groundwater resource.  

Companies interested in HF need the motivation, either through spectific requlation, or preferably to gain community acceptance, to spend the monies necessary to demonstate safe development of the resource (i.e., without unacceptable risk).  Risk that ultimately the requlators (and hopefully the public), are willing to accept.

To say that HF can never be used with acceptable risk, is not reasonable.  If a gas resources is to be developed, the onus is on both the company to prove the risk is acceptable and the requlator, to reasonably and fairly evaluate their case.   

Harold</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, your comments are very appropriate and timely, on this subject!</p>
<p>I have been dealing with groundwater contamination and well water supply issues for about 30 years.  Julian&#8217;s comments, in my opinion, represent one end of the spectrum in the arguments for and against horizontal fracking (HF).  </p>
<p>In my experience, the issue always revolves around money and risk.  In each geologic basin and hydrogeologic (i.e., water supply) area, will be unique.  Companies have been obviously historically focused on spending money to find and map the gas resource.  With HF, money also needs to be spent on integrating the geology, with the geomechanics and hydrogeology of that area; this will enable assessment of the risk to overlying groundwater resource.  </p>
<p>Companies interested in HF need the motivation, either through spectific requlation, or preferably to gain community acceptance, to spend the monies necessary to demonstate safe development of the resource (i.e., without unacceptable risk).  Risk that ultimately the requlators (and hopefully the public), are willing to accept.</p>
<p>To say that HF can never be used with acceptable risk, is not reasonable.  If a gas resources is to be developed, the onus is on both the company to prove the risk is acceptable and the requlator, to reasonably and fairly evaluate their case.   </p>
<p>Harold</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Powerful Opportunities by Bill</title>
		<link>http://newstartns.ca/2012/01/powerful-opportunities/comment-page-1/#comment-3074</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newstartns.ca/?p=952#comment-3074</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment.

Do you know of any reliable statistics on problem rates with fracking wells?

I have a feeling that they arevery  low but doubt whether there is a concensus between drillers and environmentalists.

I guess there is a point where the compensation for a homeowner can work. If there was a million barrels of oil under someone’s farm I suspect the farmer and the oil company could reach an agreement satisfactory to both.

Bill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment.</p>
<p>Do you know of any reliable statistics on problem rates with fracking wells?</p>
<p>I have a feeling that they arevery  low but doubt whether there is a concensus between drillers and environmentalists.</p>
<p>I guess there is a point where the compensation for a homeowner can work. If there was a million barrels of oil under someone’s farm I suspect the farmer and the oil company could reach an agreement satisfactory to both.</p>
<p>Bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Powerful Opportunities by Julian</title>
		<link>http://newstartns.ca/2012/01/powerful-opportunities/comment-page-1/#comment-3073</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newstartns.ca/?p=952#comment-3073</guid>
		<description>Bill,

Water supplies are forever.  They are a life source. Once destroyed through underground contamination that&#039;s it - no more drinking water for that community.  The comparative examples you use are simply ridiculous.  You can&#039;t simply compensate a homeowner if their source of clean water is destroyed, they have no water...

Ultimately it is the community that should decide if that is a risk they are willing to take - not government and not you.

And by the way, the risks are not low as you suggest, they are unknown with the proposed form of fracking.

Often I agree with you article Bill but this one is just plain uninformed. 

Fracking is bad and most importantly irreversible.

Most importantly we need to be looking at truly renewable sources of energy as well as innovative ways to conserve energy. For our children&#039;s sake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill,</p>
<p>Water supplies are forever.  They are a life source. Once destroyed through underground contamination that&#8217;s it &#8211; no more drinking water for that community.  The comparative examples you use are simply ridiculous.  You can&#8217;t simply compensate a homeowner if their source of clean water is destroyed, they have no water&#8230;</p>
<p>Ultimately it is the community that should decide if that is a risk they are willing to take &#8211; not government and not you.</p>
<p>And by the way, the risks are not low as you suggest, they are unknown with the proposed form of fracking.</p>
<p>Often I agree with you article Bill but this one is just plain uninformed. </p>
<p>Fracking is bad and most importantly irreversible.</p>
<p>Most importantly we need to be looking at truly renewable sources of energy as well as innovative ways to conserve energy. For our children&#8217;s sake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Industrial Slush Fund by Bill</title>
		<link>http://newstartns.ca/2011/12/industrial-slush-fund/comment-page-2/#comment-3027</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newstartns.ca/?p=851#comment-3027</guid>
		<description>David thanks for this. We agree on most of what you say. My concern is the undisciplined process for making the decisions, and that we are not doing enough to enable other resource industries (mining, aquaculture,oil and gas)  which could represent a promising future for rural Nova Scotia.

Bill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David thanks for this. We agree on most of what you say. My concern is the undisciplined process for making the decisions, and that we are not doing enough to enable other resource industries (mining, aquaculture,oil and gas)  which could represent a promising future for rural Nova Scotia.</p>
<p>Bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Industrial Slush Fund by David</title>
		<link>http://newstartns.ca/2011/12/industrial-slush-fund/comment-page-2/#comment-3024</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newstartns.ca/?p=851#comment-3024</guid>
		<description>Bill, 
I agree with the points you have on the process for loan evaluation and creating a sustainable business and forest industry in Nova Scotia. There is much work to be done and we need a long term strategy.

Where I have to disagree is the impact that the mill shutting down would have had. My family is a small woodlot owner and had the mill shut down, they would be off to Alberta, along with the majority of our town of 2,000(ish). The mill directly and indirectly impacts everyone in the New Ross area and if it were to shut down, it would be a disaster. 

Newsprint is not the future but the investment in bio-fuel processing as part of the deal is a start. The long term vision should be on bio-fuel as part of the mill&#039;s portfolio. This would pump back energy onto the grid.

Basically we have a 5 year window to fix the plant to be a viable industry. What many in Halifax and urban areas forget is that rural NS is tied heavily to the industry and if it AND Newpage close, rural NS will be a ghost town. 

PS - as for Bob&#039;s comment on Jan 4. I&#039;m not sure if he is a forestry operator but we&#039;re not a &quot;lucky few&quot;. This line of work comes with no hand outs even with this influx of cash to bowater. It&#039;s a daily struggle with little pay out. I&#039;d highly recommend trying this career to see how &quot;lucky&quot; it really is. You are correct though in that we need a business environment where businesses prosper not flounder.
Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill,<br />
I agree with the points you have on the process for loan evaluation and creating a sustainable business and forest industry in Nova Scotia. There is much work to be done and we need a long term strategy.</p>
<p>Where I have to disagree is the impact that the mill shutting down would have had. My family is a small woodlot owner and had the mill shut down, they would be off to Alberta, along with the majority of our town of 2,000(ish). The mill directly and indirectly impacts everyone in the New Ross area and if it were to shut down, it would be a disaster. </p>
<p>Newsprint is not the future but the investment in bio-fuel processing as part of the deal is a start. The long term vision should be on bio-fuel as part of the mill&#8217;s portfolio. This would pump back energy onto the grid.</p>
<p>Basically we have a 5 year window to fix the plant to be a viable industry. What many in Halifax and urban areas forget is that rural NS is tied heavily to the industry and if it AND Newpage close, rural NS will be a ghost town. </p>
<p>PS &#8211; as for Bob&#8217;s comment on Jan 4. I&#8217;m not sure if he is a forestry operator but we&#8217;re not a &#8220;lucky few&#8221;. This line of work comes with no hand outs even with this influx of cash to bowater. It&#8217;s a daily struggle with little pay out. I&#8217;d highly recommend trying this career to see how &#8220;lucky&#8221; it really is. You are correct though in that we need a business environment where businesses prosper not flounder.<br />
Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Price of Power by Erika</title>
		<link>http://newstartns.ca/2012/01/price-of-power/comment-page-2/#comment-2889</link>
		<dc:creator>Erika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 03:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newstartns.ca/?p=867#comment-2889</guid>
		<description>Hi Bill - I agree with the comments about conservation and local generation. 

I&#039;d love to hear if Nova Scotia is working towards a Smart Grid.  I would be very interested in using a power meter to monitor and plan efficient power usage, and feed locally generated power back into the grid. Anyone making colourful whirli-gig wind turbines?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bill &#8211; I agree with the comments about conservation and local generation. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to hear if Nova Scotia is working towards a Smart Grid.  I would be very interested in using a power meter to monitor and plan efficient power usage, and feed locally generated power back into the grid. Anyone making colourful whirli-gig wind turbines?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Price of Power by Bill</title>
		<link>http://newstartns.ca/2012/01/price-of-power/comment-page-2/#comment-2886</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 23:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newstartns.ca/?p=867#comment-2886</guid>
		<description>&quot;Numbers serve to discipline substance.Without them it is easy to follow flights of fancy,and to ignore the world as it is and to remold it nearer the heart&#039;s desire&quot;
Ralph Waldo Emerson
Why does&#039;nt the present government of NS commission a cost/benefit analysis of their renewable energy plan and then formulate the goals as goals and not &quot;flights of fancy&quot;
The URB should insist on it.
It is their duty to discipline rhetoric</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Numbers serve to discipline substance.Without them it is easy to follow flights of fancy,and to ignore the world as it is and to remold it nearer the heart&#8217;s desire&#8221;<br />
Ralph Waldo Emerson<br />
Why does&#8217;nt the present government of NS commission a cost/benefit analysis of their renewable energy plan and then formulate the goals as goals and not &#8220;flights of fancy&#8221;<br />
The URB should insist on it.<br />
It is their duty to discipline rhetoric</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

