Additional Info for Who Represents You
Posted April 10, 2013
Member’s Manual: Members’ Compensation, Expenses and Constituency Administration from House of Assembly Nova Scotia
Related ArticlesWho Represents You
- The Federal Conservatives Must Seek An Inclusive Leader February 25, 2022
- There Will Be Lasting Societal Damage When the Protest Is Over February 18, 2022
- Trudeau Is Better At Campaigning Than Governing September 17, 2021
- Affordability Issues Are a Big Part of the Platforms September 3, 2021
- What is the Ballot Question That Voters Will Answer? August 27, 2021
- What Does Nova Scotia’s Vote Say About The Federal Election? August 20, 2021
- It’s Your Turn to Choose a Government August 13, 2021
- The First Test of a Leader is the People They Appoint May 21, 2021
- The Messaging On COVID Needs To Pave The Way For Easing Restrictions February 26, 2021
- Welcome To The New Premier: Iain Rankin February 5, 2021
- Republicans Are Torn Between Trump And Truth January 29, 2021
- Delorey Wants To Compete On His Experience January 15, 2021
- Kousoulis Has Something For Everyone January 8, 2021
- Iain Rankin Leans Left January 1, 2021
- Fan Mail 2020 December 18, 2020
- American Democratic Institutions Are Fraying October 30, 2020
- The Federal Government Is Failing Both Mi’kmaq and Non-Indigenous Fishers October 23, 2020
- Job Opening: Premier’s Office. Experience and Ability Required September 25, 2020
- Trudeau’s Credibility Is Once Again On Trial August 21, 2020
- Review or Inquiry: Why Did the Liberals Get it Wrong the First Time? July 31, 2020
- Trudeau Flubs Again: Is This Strike Three? July 17, 2020
- The Conservative Leadership Race Matters: Part 2 June 19, 2020
- The Conservative Leadership Race Matters June 12, 2020
- Nothing About The Coastal Pipeline Has Changed. Why Not Just Say So? March 6, 2020
- Governments Pledging to Legislate the United Nations Declaration are Sure to Disappoint February 28, 2020
- The Liberal Mismanagement of the Pipeline File February 21, 2020
- Fan Mail 2019 December 20, 2019
- Indigenous Affairs: The Liberals Are Setting Themselves Up For Failure December 13, 2019
- Each Of The Federal Parties Should Be Worried December 6, 2019
- Party Leaders Prove Conclusively That “Better Is Always Possible” October 25, 2019
- An Ugly Campaign Grinds Its Way To A Conclusion October 18, 2019
- Trudeau’s Latest Problems Repeat a Familiar Theme September 27, 2019
- There Is No Difference Between The Parties On Abortion Rights September 13, 2019
- Trudeau’s Rare Availability To The Media This Week Is Unlikely To Be Repeated August 16, 2019
- Sunny Daze: The Deceptions Continue March 8, 2019
- Sunny Daze: Trudeau has Trashed His Carefully Cultivated Good Guy Image March 1, 2019
- Democrats Need To Nominate A Credible and Sensible Candidate for the 2020 Presidential Election February 8, 2019
- Election 2019: First Look January 25, 2019
- Some Readers Are More Enthusiastic than Others December 14, 2018
- The Democrats Should Have Done Better In The 2018 Midterm Elections November 23, 2018
- The Broader Implications of the Kavanaugh Appointment October 30, 2018
- Scheer Sets the Stage for the Conservative Election Campaign August 28, 2018
- Chaisson Has No Experience as a Politician, Clarke Has Lots August 17, 2018
- The Liberals Were Mostly Interested in Proclaiming Their Credentials as Rights Advocates August 13, 2018
- Lohr and Houston Present Two Different Campaigns August 10, 2018
- The Progressive Conservative Leadership Race July 27, 2018
- Trump Hits A Bump June 22, 2018
- Why Are People Surprised that Doug Ford Won? June 15, 2018
- Can the Federal Tories Make a Comeback in 2019? June 1, 2018
- Trudeau’s Speech: Let’s Pretend There Are No Tough Decisions April 27, 2018
- Trudeau’s Actions Often Fall Short of the Rhetoric April 13, 2018
- Democracy in the United States is Decaying February 23, 2018
- Fan Mail December 22, 2017
- Addressing Issues with Canada’s Aboriginal Peoples December 15, 2017
- A Welcome Change In Response to Sexual Misconduct Allegations December 8, 2017
- Responses To The Plea For Respectful Dialogue November 17, 2017
- Respectful Dialogue Is the Best Tool for Eliminating Racial Inequities November 3, 2017
- It’s Not Easy Being Green July 21, 2017
- Promises, Promises: Chapter 2 June 23, 2017
- Winners and Losers June 2, 2017
- The Liberal Platform May 23, 2017
- The NDP Platform May 19, 2017
- The Progressive Conservative Platform May 16, 2017
- The Liberal Record: The Good, The Bad, And The Ugly April 21, 2017
- What The Conservative Candidates Say April 14, 2017
- The Conservative Leadership Race April 7, 2017
- Democracy That Money Can Buy March 17, 2017
- How Votes Are Counted Matters January 27, 2017
- Fan Mail December 16, 2016
- Canadian Values Test November 18, 2016
- The Senate Renewal Is Missing Something November 11, 2016
- Let’s Not Upset Anyone July 22, 2016
- Promises, Promises July 15, 2016
- Resistance To Change June 18, 2016
- Order of Canada May 20, 2016
- Whither The NDP? April 15, 2016
- Voting February 26, 2016
- Fan Mail December 18, 2015
- The Senate Changes Are Not Perfect—But They’re An Improvement December 11, 2015
- Leadership Needed December 4, 2015
- Democratic Reform October 23, 2015
- What Do The Polls Tell Us? October 16, 2015
- Trade Agreements Are Good For Canada August 14, 2015
- Slaying the Senate July 31, 2015
- Getting The Facts July 24, 2015
- Harper’s Style Hurts The Substance July 17, 2015
- Testing Trudeau July 10, 2015
- Measuring Mulcair June 26, 2015
- Political Patience Is Unnatural June 12, 2015
- Some Government Scientists Feel Muzzled May 22, 2015
- Too Many Studies? March 6, 2015
- Fan Mail December 19, 2014
- Dealing With Sexual Harassment November 28, 2014
- Appraising the Liberals’ First Year October 10, 2014
- Learning About Politics September 12, 2014
- Ontario’s Election June 6, 2014
- Ivany Report: Let’s Get Moving February 21, 2014
- The Senate We (Don’t) Want February 7, 2014
- Fan Mail December 20, 2013
- Problems with the Senate November 29, 2013
- Understanding the Vote October 11, 2013
- Campaign Messages September 20, 2013
- Looking For Leadership August 2, 2013
- Senate Reform June 21, 2013
- Voters’ Choice June 14, 2013
- CRA Responds to Article on Polling May 31, 2013
- What Do We Learn From Polls? May 24, 2013
- Maritime Union? December 4, 2012
- Who Represents You? September 21, 2010
Last week’s article on nurse practitioners prompted diverse responses. Most of them were enthusiastic, but a couple were decidedly dissatisfied.
The article argued that nurse practitioners should not be required by legislation to establish formal relationships with family physicians as a condition of their right to practice. Secondly, it argued that the system should experiment more broadly with letting various health professionals expand their roles.
Those who were positive agreed that nurse practitioners should not have a legislated obligation to link to a family physician. Nurses are regulated by the College of Nursing of Nova Scotia. In the past 15 years there have been 163 proceedings that resulted in reprimands, suspensions, or revocations of license.
One observed that experienced nurses in senior roles are often an important source of development advice for newly minted physicians.
In addition, most of the responders focused on the broader idea of more flexibility in roles for health professionals.
For example, one correspondent describes “a program of Clinical Assistants in Mental Health and Addiction services in the Eastern and Northern zones. The candidates are currently in the initial phase: assessment and training. So far so good, not an overall solution but a big help to an overwhelmed system in these two zones.”
Another idea, widely used elsewhere, is Family Practice Anesthetists. They are fully licensed and certified family physicians who have done one year of extra training. They can handle a lot of the load that would otherwise require anesthetists with several more years of training.
Two correspondents expressed serious concerns. They were not about the explicit issue of what the legislation should require but rather viewed the article as promoting a further deterioration of the status of physicians.
Worries expressed included:
- Nurse practitioners take work away from family physicians. They don’t always keep the family physician informed about changes they make to treatments. Delivering care through nurse practitioners is more expensive than through family physicians.
- When the family physicians are notified of decisions—say a prescription—by a pharmacist or nurse practitioner, they have to review it for no fee and may be responsible if things go badly.
- The article was promoting more power for nurses’ unions who already have too much. Management of the healthcare system is dominated by nurses. Nova Scotian nurses are among the highest paid in the country, while doctors are among the lowest.
Not all of the assertions in the correspondence are accurate.
Nevertheless, there are valid issues.
- When a doctor sees a patient, she gets a fee for service. The economic pressure is to get it done as quickly as possible. The time allotment is 15 minutes. A nurse practitioner is paid a salary and has no reason to hurry. He is supposed to spend 30 minutes with each patient, but still gets paid if there are not enough patients to fill the day.
- Family physicians in Nova Scotia continue to be poorly paid. The government made some useful interim steps last March, but more needs to be done.
- In some of our rural areas, the population is shrinking but the workload is not because those remaining are much older than the provincial average.
- Decision-making is still far too concentrated at the top of the NSHA pyramid. A position of Vice President and Chief, Zone Operations has been established, but it will not be filled until June. It is not clear whether or how this will result in downloaded decision making.
- When there is an unexpected departure from a small group of practitioners outside of Halifax, be they specialists or family physicians, it takes a long time for a replacement to be found. Given that we are already understaffed in many areas, there is no bench strength.
The added seats at Dalhousie Medical School are welcome, but it takes a long time for them to graduate active practitioners.
- Family physicians and many specialists are independent business operators. The province is a contractor, not an employer, and cannot direct them to move to the areas of greatest need. Many feel no responsibility for succession planning. This makes resource planning difficult for health authorities.
- Patients and their families view doctors as their core resource. Nurse practitioners and others are viewed as welcome adjuncts, but complaints are focused on the shortage of doctors.
Family physicians are understandably concerned about their pay and working environment. They should view the growing contributions of other health care professionals as part of the solution, not part of the problem.
To make it work, all of the health professions need to understand that collaboration is more than a “nice to have.” And the health authority needs to be much nimbler and more responsive in its decision making.
More Recent Articles
Post a Comment
Most Recent Comments
Please feel free to leave a comment.